DOT Corrections & Clarifications

Each year the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) reviews the Hazardous Materials Regulations to identify and clarify any errors or unclear rules.  These amendments are not drastic by any means.  However, they should clarify any inconsistencies and/or typographical errors that could be mistakenly interpreted.  Some notable changes are below.

·         In CFR 49-171.8, the last sentence of the definition of “Hazardous Materials” was  amended to be consistent with other references to the definition throughout the Hazardous Materials Regulations.
·         In CFR 49-172.101, Special Provision B37 is erroneously applied to Column (7) for the Packing Group I entry of “Cyanide solutions, n.o.s.”  The Special Provision has been removed.  In addition, The proper shipping name for isomer entries for “Aminophenols” was changed from regular font to italics.  Words in italics are not required to be part of the proper shipping name, but may be used in addition to it.    
·         In CFR 49-172.102, Special Provisions B37, B50, B60, and N72 are not assigned to any entries in the Hazardous Materials Table in CFR 49-172.101.  These references are being removed from this section. 
·         In CFR 49-173.12, the unit conversion of 3 mils and 6 mils to inches was corrected from “0.12 inches” and “0.24 inches” to “0.003 inches” and “0.0006 inches” respectively.
·         In CFR 49-173.35, CFR 49-173.134, and CFR 49-178.503, there was some missing text, mistakenly added text, and slight typographical errors that were fixed. 
·         In CFR 49-178-601, general requirements for testing of non-bulk packaging and packages prescriptions were not clear and references to paragraph (g)(3) for single packaging, and to (g)(4) for combination packaging were added for clarification. 

Feel free to contact your local Enviroexpert with questions on any of these amendments.  For a complete listing click here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments, they will be reviewed and approved accordingly.

Popular posts from this blog

Tech Corner: Know your hazardous waste accumulation & storage rules

Image
One notable change triggered by the Hazardous Waste Generator Improvement rule is the marking and label requirements on hazardous waste accumulation containers while in satellite waste accumulation and in central waste storage.   Previous RCRA labeling regulations did not require generators to identify and indicate the specific hazards of the hazardous waste accumulated in containers, tanks, drip pads and containment buildings.   This resulted in a failure to communicate risks associated with wastes being accumulated or stored in different locations. Another risk associated with marking and labels was the Treatment Storage Disposal Facility (TSDF) not knowing how to treat the waste to meet land disposal restriction requirements because generators did not always identify the specific RCRA waste codes associated with the waste. To avoid these risks the following changes to hazardous waste management regulations have been applied: 1.        Satellite accumulation – Containers and
Read more

HWGI rule - Summary of important points

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Hazardous Waste Generator Improvement (HWGI) rule has been in effect since May 30, 2017.  Regardless of generator status designation, there are some important tasks generators must complete.  Here is a summary of the most important of those requirements. ·         Episodic events – Generators can exceed their designated generator status threshold once per year.  Additionally, they can petition for an additional “unplanned” event within the same year.  Generators must have an EPA ID and advise the EPA at least 30 days prior to the event.  In the case of an “unplanned” emergency, the generator must advise the EPA with 72 hours. (§262 subpart L ) ·         Re-notification – SQGs are required to re-notify of waste activities using Form 8700-12 every four years starting in 2021.  LQGs continue current system of re-notification as part of its biennial reporting requirement. (§262.18(d) ) ·         Pre-transport marking & labeling – Gener
Read more

Tech Corner: More states institute COVID-19 Standards

Image
  Credit: Simon Davis/DFID 14 states have instituted COVID-19 safety standards for the work place so far. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to surge in the US, the concern for worker safety and health has all but subsided and the need to institute COVID-19 safety standards has become very apparent. In the absence of federal leadership in establishing these standards, some governors and state health departments have stepped up to expand worker protections. Virginia was the first state to issue an Emergency Temporary Standard to protect workers during the COVID-19 pandemic along with Oregon and Michigan shortly following. Other states have issued guidelines, some of which are tied to enforcement efforts. Additional some cites also have issued ordinances geared toward protecting their local workers. Below is partial list of states along the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern regions that have adopted COVID-19 safety standards (with links to more information) Massachusetts - Safety standards f
Read more